↓ Skip to main content

Cambridge University Press

Article Metrics

Observation of Interfacial Damage in a Silk‐Epoxy Composite, Using a Simple Mechanoresponsive Fluorescent Probe

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials Interfaces, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 909)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Observation of Interfacial Damage in a Silk‐Epoxy Composite, Using a Simple Mechanoresponsive Fluorescent Probe
Published in
Advanced Materials Interfaces, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/admi.201601018
Authors

Jeremiah W. Woodcock, Ryan Beams, Chelsea S. Davis, Ning Chen, Stephan J. Stranick, Darshil U. Shah, Fritz Vollrath, Jeffrey W. Gilman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 12 22%
Professor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 30%
Materials Science 13 24%
Engineering 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#303,025
of 18,062,643 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials Interfaces
#19
of 909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,121
of 315,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials Interfaces
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,062,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.