↓ Skip to main content

Cambridge University Press

Observation of Interfacial Damage in a Silk‐Epoxy Composite, Using a Simple Mechanoresponsive Fluorescent Probe

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials Interfaces, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,684)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Observation of Interfacial Damage in a Silk‐Epoxy Composite, Using a Simple Mechanoresponsive Fluorescent Probe
Published in
Advanced Materials Interfaces, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/admi.201601018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremiah W. Woodcock, Ryan Beams, Chelsea S. Davis, Ning Chen, Stephan J. Stranick, Darshil U. Shah, Fritz Vollrath, Jeffrey W. Gilman

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 11 15%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 25%
Materials Science 14 19%
Engineering 8 11%
Unspecified 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#500,416
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials Interfaces
#26
of 1,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,947
of 336,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials Interfaces
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.