↓ Skip to main content

Cambridge University Press

James T. C. Liu (1919–1993)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asian Studies, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
James T. C. Liu (1919–1993)
Published in
Journal of Asian Studies, March 2010
DOI 10.1017/s0021911800032162
Authors

Andrew H. Plaks, Willard J. Peterson, Hai-tao Tang, Ying-shih Yu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,554,763
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Studies
#281
of 1,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,327
of 105,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Studies
#46
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.